翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Village Music
・ Village News and Southwest News
・ Village Number 1, Alabama
・ Village of Addyston Historic District
・ Village of Antwerp Historic District
・ Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
・ Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas
・ Village of Charlie Creek
・ Village of Columbus and Camp Furlong
・ Village of Cross Keys
・ Village of Daughters
・ Village of Davis Junction Town Hall
・ Village of Dreams
・ Village of East Davenport
・ Village of Edgewood Historic District
Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.
・ Village of Four Seasons
・ Village of Four Seasons, Missouri
・ Village of Greenwich Historic District
・ Village of Idiots
・ Village of La Jolla
・ Village of Lisle-Benedictine University Sports Complex
・ Village of Martinsville
・ Village of Merrick Park
・ Village of Monroe Historic District
・ Village of Morattico Historic District
・ Village of Oak Creek, Arizona
・ Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better Environment
・ Village of Secrets
・ Village of the Arts


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. : ウィキペディア英語版
Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.

''Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co.'', , more commonly ''Euclid v. Ambler'', was a United States Supreme Court landmark case argued in 1926. It was the first significant case regarding the relatively new practice of zoning, and served to substantially bolster zoning ordinances in towns nationwide in the United States and in other countries of the world including Canada.
==Facts==
Ambler Realty owned of land in the village of Euclid, Ohio, a suburb of Cleveland. The village, in an attempt to prevent industrial Cleveland from growing into and subsuming Euclid and prevent the growth of industry which might change the character of the village, developed a zoning ordinance based upon 6 classes of use, 3 classes of height and 4 classes of area. The property in question was divided into three use classes, as well as various height and area classes, thereby hindering Ambler Realty from developing the land for industry. Ambler Realty sued the village, arguing that the zoning ordinance had substantially reduced the value of the land by limiting its use, amounting to a deprivation of Ambler's liberty and property without due process.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.